Difference between revisions of "Accounting Finance:Document Imaging Management Policy"
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
| − | |+ style="caption-side: |
+ | |+ style="caption-side:top; color:#e76700;"|''Regulation'' |
''Bill 38'' |
''Bill 38'' |
||
''Part: 2, 4(3)'' |
''Part: 2, 4(3)'' |
||
| Line 187: | Line 187: | ||
| |
| |
||
*A logbook kept showing: |
*A logbook kept showing: |
||
| − | :: |
+ | ::- The date of imaging |
|| |
|| |
||
*All images retained within the DMS are automatically logged by the system. This audit facility enables uniPHARM or any authorized inspector to track and trace all scanned images and record deletions. In the event of system failure and the loss of the automatic auditing capability, proper safeguards have been established within this policy document to ensure that a backup of the system records is available as part of an overall business continuity strategy and disaster recovery plans. |
*All images retained within the DMS are automatically logged by the system. This audit facility enables uniPHARM or any authorized inspector to track and trace all scanned images and record deletions. In the event of system failure and the loss of the automatic auditing capability, proper safeguards have been established within this policy document to ensure that a backup of the system records is available as part of an overall business continuity strategy and disaster recovery plans. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | | Example || Example |
||
| + | ::- The signatures of the persons authorizing and performing the imaging |
||
| + | || |
||
| + | *See the table at Section 3.6 for the signatures of all persons authorizing and performing the imaging. uniPHARM considers that the SOPs established within this policy document and the fact that all batches are to be initialled (electronically) by the scanning operator should be sufficient to establish the identity of scanning authority and operation. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | | |
||
| − | | Example || Example |
||
| + | ::- A description of the records imaged |
||
| + | || |
||
| + | *A description of all documents approved to be scanned is maintained within the DMS Log as required under this document management policy.|- |
||
| + | | |
||
| + | ::- Whether source documents are destroyed or disposed of after imaging, and the date a source document was destroyed or disposed of |
||
| + | || |
||
| + | *Scanned documents are to be disposed of under standing waste paper disposal arrangements and in accordance with the DMS Document Scanning SOP. All scanned documents are to be deemed ‘disposed of’ within 1 month of the date of scanning. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | | |
||
| − | | Example || Example |
||
| + | ::- The imaging software maintains an index to permit the immediate location of any record, and the software inscribes the imaging date and the name of the person who does the imaging |
||
| + | || |
||
| + | *All documents scanned into the DMS will be indexed as defined in the Batch Class creation process (see VIP Image Capture Manual). |
||
| + | *The indexing process will enable all scanned documents to be retrieved efficiently. |
||
| + | *All batches scanned are automatically date/time stamped and are initialled (electronically) by the operator. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | | |
||
| − | | Example || Example |
||
| + | ::- The images are of commercial quality and are legible and readable when displayed on a computer screen or reproduced on paper |
||
| + | || |
||
| + | *The scanning operation has in-built quality control checks to ensure that documents scanned are readable on screens. The quality of images is checked via the DMS Self-inspection SOP |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | | |
||
| − | | Example || Example |
||
| + | ::- A system of inspection and quality control is established to ensure the maintenance of the required logs, indexing, and quality |
||
| + | || |
||
| + | *See DMS Self-inspection SOP |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | | |
||
| − | | Example || Example |
||
| + | ::- After reasonable notification, equipment in good working order is available to view, or where feasible, to reproduce hard copies |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | || |
||
| − | | Example || Example |
||
| + | *Hard copies of scanned images can be produced via the DMS (subject to security access permissions) |
||
|} |
|} |
||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Revision as of 12:35, 19 January 2018
Using the DIMP
- This Document Management Imaging Policy (DIMP) Manual has been designed primarily for online use. Excessive printing of the manual is discouraged in order to aid version control and minimize costs.
- Virtually all content is self-contained within a subject ‘table’ to make amendment and/or extraction as easy as possible.
- The primary means of document navigation is via the Table of Contents. However, navigation is aided by the use of ‘hyperlinks’. These dynamic links allow users to jump from one subject to a related subject (or punch out to the documents located on the Internet) by simply clicking on the link. A link is displayed by underlined blue text. To return to the original location (i.e. prior to using a hyperlink), a blue return arrow should appear towards the top left hand corner of the screen). A bookmark entitled ‘Return to Table of Contents’ has been included at the commencement of many sections to assist overall navigation. Specific topics of interest (within a sentence of paragraph) have been ‘bookmarked’ and their related subjects hyperlinked to further aid navigation and to link closely related issues.
- All references to actual Federal/Provincial regulations are in bold red text.
- The online version of the DIMP manual is to be maintained as ‘read only’.
- Glossary of Terms has been included clarification purposes.
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this document is to detail the management policy and business processes to be applied in respect of documents:
- Scanned and stored in the Gauss Document Management System (DMS)
- Accessed, viewed and retrieved from the DMS
- Destroyed as a result of scanning operations
In addition, this document is intended to demonstrate linkage to the principals required for compliance with Federal/Provincial legislation, including:
- The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act
- Food and Drugs Act (Good Manufacturing Guideline 2002 Edition)
- Income Tax Act
- Employment Insurance Act
- Employment Standards Amendment Act
- Limitation Act
1.2 Background
uniPHARM’s vision is to operate, as far as is practical, in a ‘paperless’ environment. The UNITY Project has provided the means for realising this vision through the installation of the Gauss Document Management System (DMS). This system provides uniPHARM with the capability to capture information from a wide range of paper based or electronic sources, store an electronic image of document, and allow images to be retrieved on an enterprise basis.
The benefits of the DMS are clear in terms of efficiency, space utilization and online access to information. However, in order to ensure that the DMS itself is operated efficiently and to comply with all legal requirements covering document imaging, retention, access and privacy, it is necessary to formalize polices through Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). This approach is consistent with those already in place in respect of GMP, Project Management and IT Management.
2.0 Ownership/Roles/Responsibilities
2.1 Background
The Personal Information Protection Act states that an organization is responsible for personal information under its control, including personal information that is not in the custody of the organization. The Act requires an organization to designate one or more individuals to be responsible for ensuring that the organization complies with the regulations.
2.1.1 Role Definition
The primary roles associated with the DMS are defined as follows:
| Role | Definition |
|---|---|
| Owner | Designated individual who is held responsible by the uniPHARM Leadership Group for the efficient management of the DMS and compliance with all relevant legislation |
| Administrator | Designated individual who is held responsible by the Owner for the definition of Document Classes and publication of Batch Classes |
| Operator | Designated individual who is held responsible by the Owner for the efficiency of scanning operations and the quality of scanned images |
| Technical/Security Administrator | Designated individual who is held responsible by the Owner for the efficiency of application support and security administration |
| Delegate | Designated individual held responsible by the Owner for fulfilling the role (as approved by the Owner) of :
|
| User | Any individual who has been approved to:
|
2.1.2 Ownership/Roles/Responsibilities
The following table details the individuals who will be responsible and accountable for the management and delivery of the DMS and the extent of their responsibilities:
| Name | Nancy Ng |
|---|---|
| Role | Owner of the DMS |
| Responsibilities |
|
| Delegate | Christine Del Rosario |
| Name | Christine Del Rosario |
|---|---|
| Role |
|
| Responsibilities' |
|
| Delegate | Nancy Ng |
| Name | Gordie Lee |
|---|---|
| Role |
|
| Responsibilities |
|
| Delegates | Gerald Petznek |
| Name | Chelsea Manasala |
|---|---|
| Role |
|
| Responsibilities |
|
| Delegates | Christine Del Rosario, Nancy Ng |
| Name | Angela Chan |
|---|---|
| Role |
|
| Responsibilities |
|
| Delegates | Nancy Ng |
| Name | Norwin Uy |
|---|---|
| Role |
|
| Responsibilities |
|
| Delegate | Darren Freedman |
3.0 Impact of Legislation
3.1 Income Tax Act and Employment Insurance Act
| Federal regulations concerning the imaging of tax/employment insurance related documentation require the following: | uniPHARM’s interpretation of and response to these requirements is as follows: | ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
|